Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Reverse missionaries & the Great De-Commission

from here

u-turn.jpgA favorite updated for your reading pleasure.
Typical evangelism for any religion involves someone going out at some degree of expense and risk to share what one believes to be true.  It is a pretty simple and logical concept: If you think you know the true path to forgiveness, joy, peace and eternal life and you truly care about others, then of course you’ll want to share the Good News (regardless of how you define it).
However, some people hold the view that all religions are equally valid paths to God.  As I was reflecting on the discussions on the Jesus is still the only way thread, I was reminded that people who hold the “all religions are valid” view should have a completely different model of evangelism.  Wouldn’t it be most loving for them to send “reverse missionaries” to encourage everyone to follow their local religions?  After all, consider the persecuted people around the world who could avoid pain, suffering, economic loss, prison and even death if they just held beliefs more palatable to their culture.
For example, you’d want to send people to Christians in India, N. Korea, China, all Arab countries and more to explain to them that Hinduism/Islam/Buddhism/etc. are just as good and that they should leave Christianity to maximize their comfort and happiness.  If you follow any organizations like Voice of the Martyrs you are probably familiar with how much Christians suffer for their faith in many parts of the world.  Why suffer like that if other religions are just as good?
And loving universalists (those who believe everyone is going to Heaven, regardless of what they believe) should go to China to encourage people to be atheists.
What a tragedy that hundreds of thousands or even millions of Christians died unnecessarily for their faith over the centuries.  They should have just recanted and gone with the local religion, right?
What I’ve found is that religious pluralists and universalists do no such thing. They typically think their “home religion” is correct (why else would they belong to those denominations?) but are afraid to offend someone or risk rejection for sharing their view, or perhaps are unwilling to work to learn their beliefs well enough to defend them.
Shouldn’t false teachers who insist that all religions lead to God lend their time and money to being reverse missionaries?  Yet I never hear of them undertaking such efforts to reduce the “needless” suffering of Christians around the world.  Real faith is behaving as if what you say you believe is true.  Yet these folks don’t follow through to the logical consequences of their worldview.  This is one of the easiest ways to spot false teachers.
Of course, since I hold the view that Jesus is the one way to salvation then it is on my heart to share that with people.
If you encounter “Christians” claiming that other or even all religions are valid paths to God, ask them simply and politely if that means we should end Christian evangelism efforts and “evangelize” people to follow whatever “valid” religion will result in the least persecution for them.  It will help expose their false view and hopefully encourage them to think more carefully.  They shouldn’t judge God for “only” providing one way to salvation, they should be eternally grateful that He offered a way at all.

Sunday, October 27, 2013

What Would Neutral Science Ed Look Like?

from here

The American education system claims to teach as fact only things which aren’t part of any religion. But they refuse to admit Evolution is a form of religion without a central “god” but with all the other parts any religion has. Every area of evolution is based on reasoned guesses and belief about things no one observed or experimented on as it happened.
Creationism has more observational science on its side (chickens have chicks, beans grow beans, rapid deposits of sediment can be observed in real time, etc.), but is still rooted in faith.
In this case, what would science class look like if the teaching was truly neutral?
  • Astronomy would discuss what we see and detect with our telescopes. No mention wouldEnglish: A collage of organisms. be made of how anything got there or of “star formationsince no human being has ever seen these things happen.
  • Biology would discuss systems, cellular processes, and interactions without guessing how any organism came to be the way it is.
  • Animal and plant studies would sort things by form, function, and location, never stating that one type developed into another beyond what can be observed (like breeding, interbreeding and rapid adaptation).
  • Geology would look at rocks and layers based on depth, layering, and composition without guessing how they formed or how old they could be.
  • Anthropology would begin with the first artifacts without assuming the makers of those objects lacked intelligence and would acknowledge the sudden jump from survival-living to high civilization.
In other words, you can’t touch on any origins without touching on faith in something.
Does this seem like an impossible dream? Well, it probably is for governmental schools. But, it is a present reality in homeschooling circles. Many curriculums have decided it would turn too many people away to go beyond observable facts to worldview based conclusions.
Family Reading Hour
Now, many of these curriculums are authored and published by Christians (I would list them by name, but want one of them to publish my book). You don’t have to look to far to find books happy to say “God did it”. But it is far more rare to find ones willing to say, “and this is how God told us He did it” with the natural conclusions that must follow (there are plenty of differing theories in Creationism. You could mention all of them, or just leave the details vague).
So, what’s a parent or caring adult to do? Just recognizing this reality is a good step. My parents were/are firm young earth creationists but didn’t realize the low level of instruction we were being given by our homeschooling curriculae. Turns out, my brother fell for Evolution the first time he read a cool popular level magazine article for himself. There are no guarantees as parents, but preparing our kids gives them a fighting chance.
WLA cma Suit of armor c 1530 steel
If you’re homeschooling, take the extra time to search around my site (especially Evolution 101), creation.com, answersingenesis.org, and Dr. Wile’s blog for direct responses to common Evolutionary claims. The facts ARE on the Creator’s side, but the media surely aren’t.
For public school kids, the same hold true. They will also benefit from training in how to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves in their classrooms. Creation Ministries International has a good article on what this would look like.
Basically, no caring God-fearing adult can afford to let their kids just slide through life. Not that this has been ever true, but we know how serious the consequences are for the upcoming generation!
Which we have heard and known, and our fathers have told us.
We will not hide them from their children, shewing to the generation to come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works that he hath done. Psalm 78:3,4

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Pseudoscience and the stifling of debate

from here
Published: 5 September 2013 (GMT+10)
Wikimedia commons/Leaflet
7277-windmill
Much effort is currently being expended to persuade the general public that lavish investment in ‘green energy’ (such as wind farms) is vital for our planet’s future and is also scientifically justified. My purpose here is not to argue for or against the claims of pro-climate-change scientists and politicians, but to look at how prominent spokespersons are going about their task.1 Promoters of the idea that people, penguins and pomegranates share a common ancestor are fond of claiming that contrary voices are ‘anti-science’—a charge that is also being levelled at those who disagree with the party line on ‘climate change’.2 It is instructive for us to examine the rhetoric and tactics used by the critics of the climate change sceptics because they are identical to those employed against critics of evolution.

Pseudoscience and politics

Beliefs and claims are sometimes put forward as science, in spite of a lack of supporting evidence, and sometimes in the face of uncomfortable facts. Ideas being advanced may be too vague to be reliably tested using the scientific method. We call such things pseudoscience. Ironically, while it is true that evolution believers sometimes charge biblical creationists with pseudoscience, molecules-to-man evolution is far more worthy of this epithet.3 Here are a few hallmarks of pseudoscience practitioners:
  • Withholding data from the public;
  • Telling non-scientists we must trust and believe the scientists who are making a particular set of claims;
  • Silencing dissenting voices;
  • Claiming that the ‘deniers’ are seizing on scientific uncertainty as proof the idea is wrong;
  • Saying people are wrong to question the orthodox, majority position;
  • Denouncing critics and calling them names—e.g. ‘flat-earthers’, ‘Holocaust-deniers’
When pseudoscience is promoted dogmatically as indisputable truth, a form of scientism4 may be the result. Earlier this year, Leon Wieseltier (a self-described humanist) publically stated: “Science is a blessing, but scientism is a curse. … scientism is dogmatic, and peddles certainties. It is always at the ready with the solution to every problem … so it gives scientific answers to non-scientific questions. Owing to its preference for totalistic explanation, scientism transforms science into an ideology …”5 While Wieseltier wasn’t talking about evolution, this description certainly fits it well!

‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’ (AGW) tactics

In looking at the manner in which AGW-supporters are promoting their agenda, we call to the witness stand several journalists—their testimony combines to underline points that I’ve bulleted above (bold emphases are mine):
UK, Open Government Licence v1.0
7277-ed-davey
Ed Davey—since February 2012, the UK’s Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.
In June, the UK Government’s Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Davey, severely criticised certain British newspapers “for giving sanctuary to deniers of climate change.”6 The Telegraph went on to say: “If Mr Davey is so confident in his facts, he should surely be confident of their triumphing in a free and open debate. … Mr Davey claims sceptics ‘seize upon the normal expression of scientific uncertainty… as proof that all climate change policy is all hopelessly misguided’.” If evolutionists are so confident in their facts, they should surely be confident of their triumphing in a free and open debate with biblical creationists and Intelligent Design advocates. Yes, biblical creationists do highlight scientific uncertainty regarding evolutionary theories. But, that is surely a valid point to make, when people are given a false impression that there is no such uncertainty. Furthermore, we also marshal a formidable array of hard scientific facts that are more than sufficient to blow evolution sky high.
The Daily Mail also took exception to this attempt to stifle the expression of contrary views: “…politicians increasingly think they have the right to tell the Press what it can print. … Yesterday it was the turn of … Ed Davey, who said it was wrong for the Press to give a ‘platform’ to anybody daring to question the political orthodoxy on climate change.”7 Pseudoscience in its worst incarnation can become full-on scientism which, assuming an air of orthodoxy, readily becomes a politicised imposition of dogma upon society. This can certainly be said of evolution, where anything perceived to weaken the secular stranglehold on public thinking on origins is quickly jumped on.8 Name-calling is also frequently part of the mix when the argument is weak, so it’s perhaps unsurprising that sceptics of AGW have also been described by Ed Davey as “crackpots and conspiracy theorists”.9

Journalists in Germany have also reacted quickly to attempted censorship of AGW’s critics. Referring to the ‘naming-and-shaming’ tactics of the German Environment Agency, Germany’s Science Press Association stated: “It is not the task of a government agency to determine which opinions may be expressed and which are not. … Journalists may and must voice different positions, and they may and must question well-established scientists again and again. Moreover it cannot be the task of a public institution to quasi officially declare certain scientific positions as true.”10 Would that they were just as keen to question evolutionary scientists and to give voice to those who disagree with evolution!
As recently as July, a respected senior economist wrote in The Spectator magazine: “‘We should listen to the scientists—and we should believe them,’ said Ed Davey, the Climate Secretary, earlier this year. Yet his department has officially sanctioned the anti-scientific practice of withholding data. The climate secretary has denounced sceptics and other non-believers as ‘crackpots’—an attack conforming to a key feature of what the philosopher Karl Popper defined as pseudoscience. Genuine science invites refutation; pseudoscience tries to silence dissent.”11 Substitute climate science with evolution and these words are uncannily relevant to the creation versus evolution debate.

Antidotes to evolutionary pseudoscience

Why not read the bullet points earlier in this article and consider how you, personally, could combat some of those things. Good information is vital, as well as getting the facts out there, however unpopular that may be—whether in the debate over climate change or evolution. Those who love truth have nothing to fear from an honest appraisal of scientific data.
Regarding origins, Creation magazine furnishes its readers with all the latest facts unmasking the pseudoscience of evolution. CMI also strongly recommends that people read and inwardly digest The Creation Answers Book, which provides responses to the most commonly asked questions about science and the Bible. If you don’t already subscribe to INFObytes, our free e-mail newsletter, we encourage you to do so today—you can do this on this page, or the creation.com homepage. Spread the word by raising awareness of CMI in your church, with relatives and friends, and with colleagues at work or at school. And please do consider supporting CMI on a regular basis to keep on with its vital mission.
Finally, always be praying for God’s wisdom when considering the best ways of influencing others and for His boldness in standing firm if your efforts are unappreciated or strongly resisted. And remember that “the battle is the Lord’s” (1 Sam. 17:47).

Related Articles

Further Reading

References

  1. A shorter version of this article first appeared in the September 2013 issue of CMIEXTRA, a newsletter of Creation Ministries International (UK/Europe). Return to text.
  2. Interestingly, vocal anti-creationist and Australian geology professor Ian Plimer (see CMI’s DVD Facing the Fire), is also a staunch sceptic of the idea that reducing carbon emissions will substantially affect global climate. Once a media darling for his fanatical pursuit of creationists, he is now experiencing similar shunning and silencing to that which he welcomed for his foes. Return to text.
  3. Is evolution pseudoscience? Creation, 29(4):25–27, 2007. Also at creation.com/pseudoscience. Return to text.
  4. Used here in the sense of an improper use of the perceived authority of science. Return to text.
  5. From a talk he gave on 19 May 2013, Brandeist University, Massachusetts, USA; www.newrepublic.com/article/113299/leon-wieseltier-commencement-speech-brandeis-university-2013, accessed 1 August 2013. Return to text.
  6. Remove the blinkers, 3 June 2013, www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/10096133/Remove-the-blinkders.html, accessed 1 August 2013. Return to text.
  7. Gay marriage, peers and a vote of principle, 3 June 2013, www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2335434/Gay-marriage-peers-vote-principle.html, accessed 1 August 2013. Return to text.
  8. See the book Slaughter of the Dissidents and the DVD Expelled: No intelligence allowed, available from creation.com/store. Return to text.
  9. Ed Davey: Climate change deniers are ‘crackpots’, 19 June 2013, www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/10129372/Ed-Davey-Climate-change-deniers-are-crackpots.html, accessed 1 August 2013. Return to text.
  10. Martin Schneider, CEO of Informationsdienst Wissenschaft, 3 June 2013, http://idw-online.de/pages/de/news536360 (in German). Return to text.
  11. Rupert Darwall, Forecast failure: how the Met Office lost touch with reality: Ideology has corrupted a valuable British institution, 13 July 2013, www.spectator.co.uk/features/8959941/whats-wrong-with-the-met-office/, accessed 1 August 2013. Return to text.

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Does the Bible Tell Christians to Judge Not?

from here

by Ken Ham, Steve Golden, Jeremy Ham, and David Chakranarayan, AiG–U.S

We live in a world that increasingly strives to (supposedly) promote the idea of tolerance, but actually becomes intolerant of Christian absolutes as it does so. Whether it involves religion, behavior, or human sexuality, there is a growing anti-Christian sentiment in America and other Western nations. Ultimately, built into this “tolerance” is the concept that truth is determined by each individual, not by God. This has led many people to conclude that making judgments on anyone (especially coming from Christians) is wrong because the Bible says ”judge not” (Matthew 7:1). Interestingly enough, those who reject the notion of God or the credibility of the Bible often attempt to use God’s Word (e.g., by quoting verses out of context) to excuse their actions when they are presented with the gospel and the plight of sinners for rejecting it.

The Authority on Judging

Scripture makes it very clear that there is one supreme Judge of all—the Lord God—and that He alone has the authority to determine right and wrong motives and behaviors.
Many Old Testament passages attest to the truth of God as Judge:
God is a just judge, and God is angry with the wicked every day. (Psalm 7:11)
He shall judge the world in righteousness, and he shall administer judgments for the people in uprightness. (Psalm 9:8)
Let the heavens declare His righteousness, for God himself is Judge. Selah (Psalm 50:6)
For the Lord is our Judge, the Lord is our Lawgiver, the Lord is our King; He will save us. (Isaiah 33:22)
The Old Testament is rife with passages that establish God as the ultimate Judge. When we come to the New Testament, we find that the Father has committed authority and judgment to the Son. Jesus spoke of this authority before He ascended to heaven after the Resurrection (Matthew 28:18).
“For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgment to the Son.” (John 5:22)
“I have come as a light into the world, that whoever believes in Me should not abide in darkness. And if anyone hears My words and does not believe, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world but to save the world. He who rejects Me, and does not receive My words, has that which judges him—the word that I have spoken will judge him in the last day.” (John 12:46–48)
Because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead. (Acts 17:31)
As these passages and many others demonstrate, the Bible makes it very clear that one day Jesus will rightly judge all humanity based on each individual’s faith in—or rejection of—the Son of God. For a world filled with people who believe in moral relativism—and for many professing Christians who practice morality in an attempt to earn righteousness—this day will be filled with fear and trepidation. The Judge of the universe has made a judgment about salvation, echoed by the Apostle Peter in Acts 4:12: “Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” There will be no time to debate whether the judgment is right or wrong because the ultimate Judge has decreed His justice through the Son.
Let us consider the idea of judging as it relates to believers and unbelievers. The methods are different when dealing with these two groups, but the goal is reconciliation. Unbelievers need to know Christ and be reconciled to Him, and believers need to grow in Christ and be reconciled to each other.

How Judging Relates to Unbelievers

When a Christian lovingly and graciously presents the gospel to unbelievers, a judgment is made regarding their standing with God. The Bible clearly declares that all men are sinners, have fallen short of the glory of God, and are in need of redemption from their sins (Romans 3:23). This judgment is not made from the opinion of the Christian who is presenting the gospel but rather by what the Bible clearly declares.
The claim that Christians are not to judge is often made when dealing with issues such as abortion, adultery, homosexual behavior, and same-sex marriage. When a Christian says, for example, that homosexual behavior is a sin and that same-sex marriage is wrong, he or she is often met with objections like the following:
  • “Who are you to judge two people who love each other?”
  • “Who do you think you are, telling someone who they can and cannot love? You’re a sinner, too!”
  • “Someone’s private life is none of your business. Don’t judge them.”
Some people will even quote Matthew 7:1, where Christ said during the Sermon on the Mount, “Judge not, that you be not judged.” Of course, when they quote this verse in regard to such situations, they take it out of context to support their fallacious claims. When we consider the concept of judging, especially as it relates to the Sermon on the Mount, Christ tells us to be discerning, not condemning.
There are significant logical problems with the claim that believers should not make judgments. The first becomes evident when we read the context of Matthew 7:1.
“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.” (Matthew 7:1–5)
Here, Christ is warning believers against making judgments in a hypocritical or condemning manner. That type of judging is a characteristic often associated with the Pharisees during the ministry of Jesus. Many people who quote “judge not” from Matthew 7:1 fail to notice the command to judge in Matthew 7:5, when it says, “Then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” The point Jesus emphasizes here is to judge yourself first before you make judgments about others. (Also, notice the discernment and judgment required in Matthew 7:15–16, 20.) In the broader context, Jesus is telling believers to be discerning when it comes to false teaching and false prophets because they “look” Christian, but their goal is to lead the flock astray (Matthew 7:15–20; Luke 6:43–45).
As Christians, we should be living godly lives so that we can first concentrate on our own repentance of sin. Sanctification is a lifelong process of being transformed every day into the image of Christ. Without this, we have no place in helping another brother or sister. What Christ teaches His believers in Matthew 7 is that if we ourselves are not personally repenting of our sins, we are in no place to tell others how sinful they are acting. But the Bible does tell us to preach the gospel—and part of the gospel message is that people are sinners in need of salvation.

How Judging Relates to Fellow Believers

We often hear claims from Christians that we are not to make judgments about other believers, especially as it relates to their erroneous teachings on Genesis. Again, the Matthew 7:1 passage is used as a justification for this type of attitude. Now, the ministry of Answers in Genesis acknowledges that there are many Christian pastors and leaders who sincerely have a love for the Lord Jesus Christ. These men have led many to Christ, work diligently with much perseverance for the kingdom of God, and minister to the hurting and sick—all because they have been transformed by the finished work of Christ on the Cross and His Resurrection from the dead. However, just like the rest of us, they are fallible and can fall into error, even regarding the issue of origins.
Scripture provides many examples of how God’s people can be in error, dating back to (and before) the kings of Israel and Judah. Out of the 39 rulers in Israel and Judah after the time of Solomon, only eight of them (1 Kings 1–2, all from Judah) tried to reverse the evil their predecessors had introduced into the kingdom. Only eight of them saw the depravity around them and tried to do something about it. However, these godly kings had failures as well. These eight kings have their histories tarnished because they failed to take down the high places (1 Kings 15:11, 14; 22:43; 2 Kings 12:2–3; 14:3–4; 15:3–4, 34–35). Upon entering Canaan, the Israelites were commanded to destroy everything, including pagan places of worship on high mountains. Rather than destroy them, the Israelites made them into additional worship centers, contrary to what they had been commanded by God. Even the godliest of people are capable of falling into error.
The core message of Answers in Genesis is one of defending biblical authority and proclaiming the gospel, which brings controversy when it comes to the topic of judging. For instance, in addition to dealing with the issues above from a biblical perspective, Answers in Genesis points out that there are many Christians (including Christian leaders) who add millions of years, evolution, or both to Scripture. We expose this compromise not to make harsh judgments about the person or his spiritual walk, but to show the inconsistency (as we all can be) of a Christian leader towards Genesis—and the negative implications that it can have on the rest of Scripture.
Now, the ministry of AiG is dedicated to upholding the authority of the Bible and giving answers to point out that such compromise positions are really undermining God’s Word and its authority. When AiG does that, we are often told that we are unloving and that we should not be making judgments about others by pointing out errors in their teaching regarding Genesis.
Some people take offense and say that as believers, we should focus on loving others and not be divisive. We are, however, divisive if we do not correct error. Are we working toward the “unity of the faith” (Ephesians 4:13), or are we compromising God’s Word by allowing for the world’s “wisdom”? Remember, as believers we are all part of “one faith” (Ephesians 4:5). We must establish our foundation in the truth of God’s Word and not our own philosophies, making God the authority over our life. Having the right foundation will help us to know the difference between truth and lies as well as right and wrong. Paul explained the need for truth and the divisive nature of lies in the following passage:
That we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head—Christ—from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love. (Ephesians 4:14–16)
Are we being loving if we allow our fellow brethren to remain in error and even deceive others? Of course not. Loving others requires that we graciously correct them when they fall into error (Matthew 18; 1 Corinthians 1:11; Galatians 6:1). Those who err do not necessarily know they are in error; they are possibly deceived or ignorant. So we gently and carefully correct the error in regard to teaching, no matter what the situation. After all, this is one of the responsibilities of the church: to teach sound doctrine and correct erroneous teaching (2 Timothy 2:25, 3:16; Titus 2:1). For example, we have to use discernment (judging between right and wrong) if we are to obey verses like 1 Corinthians 5:11–13; 6:4; 2 Thessalonians 3:6; 1 Timothy 6:20; and Titus 3:9, just to name a few.
We need to be careful in this approach, however, as we are all fallible human beings who can make mistakes in judgment. We should find out the whole story and not base our judgment on appearances. Jesus stated, “Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment” (John 7:24). Notice the Lord’s command to judge. But before we make that judgment, we must make sure we are judging righteously from God’s Word and not relying on our own opinion. Sometimes hard judgment calls must be made, as not everything is “black and white,” which is why it is so important to know and apply the truth of Scripture.
It’s also important when discussing such difficult issues to explain, as a Christian, why we take the stand we do. For instance, when asked about same-sex marriage, we can explain that Christians should build their thinking on the Bible, and therefore we should go to God’s Word to see what He clearly instructs us. Then we use His Word to make a judgment about the issue. We can also explain that if someone does not believe that God’s Word is the foundation for their worldview, then we can understand why they disagree. So, we have two different starting points (or foundations), and thus two different worldviews that conflict and therefore make judgments of each other. But in every instance, we must stress that all sin can be forgiven in the work of Christ on the Cross.
Realistically, people make judgments all the time. Now, if one person commits murder, should a Christian look at that action and say, “That was wrong because God’s Word says not to murder,” or should he say, “I’m not supposed to make a judgment”? And what if someone steals from you? Would you say, “That was wrong because God’s Word says not to steal,” or would you say, “I’m not supposed to make a judgment”? Furthermore, when someone tells us that we need to stop judging others, they have actually just judged us. So they are guilty of doing the very thing they tell us not to do.
We make judgments on various teachings and ideas every day, including our own. The biblical mentality of making judgments applies to any situation where a person is openly committing an error against God and His Word—whether that person is living in sin, such as adultery or homosexual behavior, or compromising God’s Word and causing others to stumble and doubt His Word. We even make judgments of our children’s actions as we work to help them see their sinful condition before God, and point them to the gospel, in order that they might be saved and grow in obedience to God and His Word.
The key is making righteous judgments so that we can point people to the gospel. God’s Word gives us a clear standard to abide by, and the Holy Spirit guides us in what is right, wrong, true, and false. In order to make judgments righteously, we should be striving to live righteously and allowing the Word of God to be our foundation in every area of our thinking.

Conclusion: Biblical Perspective of “Judge Not”

Those people who call for tolerance and quote “judge not” out of context are not using sound thinking. Their call for tolerance is impossible because as Christians, we are called to judge righteously, and judging between right and wrong is something we do every day—and it should be a part of biblical discernment in every believer’s thinking. But it is God’s Word that makes the judgment on morality and truth, not our own opinions or theories.
What’s the purpose of judging error in a biblical manner? The church is to be built on the foundation of Christ and the authority of His Word (Ephesians 2:20)—and that means believers should examine their own lives regularly and also lovingly challenge Christian brothers and sisters who are in error or commit sin. To do this, believers must be bold for Christ, but they also have to be humble, loving, and kind. We encourage you to keep these things in mind as you strive daily to maintain unity in the truth of Christ (John 17:20–26).

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

What about those who've never heard?




For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts. -Isaiah 55:9
from here

By Dan Delzell , Special to CP
July 5, 2013|9:07 am

A perplexing predicament posed to Christians goes like this: "What about all those people in various lands who have never heard the Gospel message? Are you telling me they are lost and on the road to hell?"

Of course the usual assumption behind these questions is that God would never condemn someone who has not been told about the free gift of salvation through faith in Christ. So let's run with that idea for a minute. Let's say, hypothetically, that all those folks are not lost. Instead, let's pretend for the sake of argument that people who have never heard about Jesus are already on the road to heaven simply by virtue of having never heard the Gospel message.
Right away, we see how this theory comes crumbling down. Why? Because if those folks who have never heard the good news are already on the path to paradise, Jesus would have been risking their eternal life in heaven by commanding His disciples to go out and preach the Gospel to them. That zealous approach to proselytizing would place potential converts in a situation where they might reject Christ and His Gospel, and as a result suffer the eternal consequences of saying "no" to Jesus and His love.
If those adults who have never heard the Gospel are already safe in the arms of Jesus forever, then the greatest evangelistic strategy would have been for our Lord to tell His disciples something like this: "Go into all the world and be kind to people, but under no circumstances should you ever tell someone that he or she must repent and believe in me in order to be forgiven of their sins and go to heaven. If you do that, you are placing their eternal safety in jeopardy by leading them into a discussion where they might decide to reject the Gospel message."
Obviously, that is not what the Lord told them. Jesus lived and died as though men are lost without His forgiveness. And He sent out His disciples as though people who have never heard the message are lost until they hear and believe the good news.
The apostle Paul wrote, "How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, 'How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!' But not all the Israelites accepted the good news. For Isaiah says, 'Lord, who has believed our message?' Consequently, faith comes from hearing the message, and the message is heard through the word of Christ." (Romans 10:14-17)
God's Word gives us no indication that those who have never heard are already in "the safe zone" so to speak. In fact, the Bible says just the opposite. "What may be known about God is plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities – His eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse." (Romans 1:19,20)
This highlights the urgent need for Christians to spread the Gospel to those who have never heard it. Every person will have to give an account of himself to God. If those who have never heard the good news are in grave danger of being lost eternally, how much more so any of us who have heard the message and yet continue to reject it?
Jesus said, "Repent and believe the good news." (Mark 1:15) Paul and Silas told the jailer in Philippi, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved." (Acts 16:31) Jesus said, "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die." And then He asked Martha, "Do you believe this?" (John 11:25,26)
Well, do you? Are you a believer? Or are you like those the Bible speaks about when it says, "The message they heard was of no value to them, because those who heard did not combine it with faith." (Hebrews 4:2)
The Gospel message combined with faith produces what I would call "spiritual fusion." It is extremely powerful. It brings about "the new birth." (John 3:1-16; 1 Peter 1:3) When a person accepts the message with the faith of a child, the Lord Himself enters that person's heart and life. It begins an eternal relationship with Christ which will take the individual to heaven one day.
Our Lord made this message perfectly clear when He stated, "God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through Him. Whoever believes in Him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son." (John 3:16-18)
Did you catch that? Jesus said, "Whoever does not believe stands condemned already." These unbelievers, like you and I, are sinners in need of the Savior. So when it comes to those who have never heard, it is our job as Christians to reach them with the Gospel. How else are they going to know about God's amazing grace and eternal love which are given freely through faith in Christ?
Jesus told His disciples, "Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned." (Mark 1:15,16) Our job as believers is not to try to figure out why God designed it this way. Instead, we are commanded by Christ to "go and make disciples of all nations." (Matthew 28:19)
"How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!" (Romans 10:15) And how blessed are those who not only hear it, but who then "combine it with faith" in an act of "spiritual fusion" whereby their soul is converted and brought into "the safe zone" of God's grace and forgiveness.
So now that you have heard this message, what do you plan to do about it?


Sunday, October 13, 2013

Ignite the Fire: 4 Ways to Invest In your Husband

from here

4 Ways to Invest In Your Husband

ignite-fixed

Today we begin Week 1 of the “Ignite The Fire” Marriage Series!

4 Ways to Invest In Your Husband
An investment is something we commit to, in order to gain a return.  We invest money in retirement plans.  We invest time into things we enjoy and we invest our hearts in those we love.
The opposite of investment is to take out, drain, use up or treat as expendable.
Have you looked at your time spent on your husband as an investment?
Many in our culture today, go into marriage thinking about what they can take out of the relationship.  They are “me” focused and when the marriage fails to give “me” an immediate return – they treat the marriage like it’s expendable.  Out they go.
Recently I was listening to Matt Chandler speaking on a video and he said – (this is a paraphrase)
“We live in a culture that does not understand love.  It is “unsexy” to say “I’m in this and I’m not going anywhere.”  Instead our culture views that as, “you poor soul, you mean you don’t have butterflies in your stomach everytime you see that person?  God would want you to have that.”  But as someone who laid on the floor and was completely helpless for 18 months (Matt suffered from a malignant brain tumor in 2009) and to have my wife say “I love you and I’m not going anywhere.”  Let me tell you, it’s a far sexier love when you have nothing to offer and are definitely not meeting any of their needs  and they still say, “I love you and I’m not going anywhere”.  We need to teach the world what real love is.  This is a gospel issue.  Our culture simply does not have the framework to understand.”
Loving our husband through the hard times, through the valleys, and when they are most unlovable  - reveals the gospel in our lives.  It shows that we are true followers of Christ –  loving unconditionally and laying our lives down for another.
Some think marriage is a bad investment!  They tell our young ones to wait as long as they can before “tying the knot” or encourage them to live together and test this marriage thing out before committing.
There is a stigma to marrying young.
But can I say for all those who just can’t understand why some marry so young…
If you are striving to remain pure until your wedding day –then cohabiting is not an option and marrying young is likely and to be praised!
Many who are waiting because they are just too young to make such a large decision are living in sin and in fornication because society has perverted the glorious view of marriage that God created for us to enjoy and…invest in!
Sweet wives – you hold a precious title.  The title of Wife!  Social confusion, discontentment and dissatisfaction will bring us down if we do not rise above it through the power of God and his word.
According to Proverbs 31:10 – A good wife is of exceptional worth. We hold a vital role in the life of our husbands. God said in Genesis 2:18 “It is not good for a man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him.” There is nothing on earth more fulfilling than the intimacy I share with my husband and the day our wedding bells rang – I was thrilled to be receiving the title “wife”.
But this coming week, my husband and I will  celebrate 16 years since those wedding bells rang and it’s true – the butterflies are a lot less frequent.  But the depth of love, from embracing our roles written out in scripture, knows no bounds.  It multiplies exponentially every year!
It is by far the best investment I’ve made in my life and each time I invest my time, energy, heart and soul into my marriage – I continue to reap a return on my investment.
But we all have weak spots and parts of our marriage that we have neglected to pour time or energy into.  Sometimes it’s our husband who points these spots out and other times – we just know in our heart that we have been neglectful.
Here are 4 Ways to Invest in Your Husband this week:
1.  Pray –  Have you prayed for your husband yet today?  Pause right now and cover him in prayer.
2. Communicate - have you told your husband you love him and appreciate him yet today? Pause – email or text him right now and tell him how grateful you are for him.
3. Get physically intimate – have you kissed your husband yet today? Purpose to kiss him like you mean it the next time you see him.
4. Get help - Do the tasks in #1 through #3 appear daunting, impossible, undesirable or nearly offensive to you…get help. Your marriage is not in a good place if you are no longer spiritually, emotionally and physically able to invest in your husband.  If you cannot bring yourself to do these three things on your own – then you need the help of God and possibly a trusted counselor, pastor, mentor or Christian marriage book, to help you break through the walls that have been built up in your marriage.
I want to invite you to join me in accepting the challenge of Week 1 of the Ignite Your Fire series?
Ignite the passion in your marriage by investing into your husband joyfully.  This may look different in every marriage.  The challenge is to focus on an area of your marriage that is a little weak and pour time, energy and love into it.
Walk with the King,

Courtney


ignite-small-fixed

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

An Open Letter to Johnny Manziel

from here


Dear Johnny:

I live in what was once your home town. I have a son who cannot wait to be old enough to proudly sport a Tivy Antlers jersey. I have a son who watched you play high school football and even met you a time or two when you still lived here. This same son quickly broke his mama’s burnt orange heart and converted to an Aggie when you committed to A&M. He has your jersey and still wears it with great pride. And that’s why, even though you’ll likely never see this, I have to write this letter.
My son, and my family, watch every game. Even this burnt orange wearing mom has cheered you on since blue & gold were your Friday Night Lights colors. But besides the games, unfortunately, we’ve also watched the mistakes in the public eye. How can we miss them? Until recently, you paraded them around on social media as if you felt you were untouchable. And that’s led us, and many other parents I’m sure, to have hard conversations with our son. Conversations that talk about character being more important than fame. Conversations about your true worth not being found in your athletic ability, but in your daily actions that define you as a person. Conversations about the responsibility that comes with success and fame. Conversations about how you are a great athlete, but not a great role model.
But here’s the thing. My 6th grade son teaches me a lot about life. And even after today’s game he sees redemption for you. As I sat, as a very frustrated fan and mom, watching you trash talk and wondering if you’ve learned a single lesson lately…as I sat (ok, I don’t sit. I walk around as much as coaches and talk at players like you can hear me) and told you to get the chip off your shoulder and just play…I listened to my son see the good. He still sees (as America does) what a tremendous athlete you are. He still sees that you’re not just good at football, you have a gift. He still sees that Tivy High School Senior that came to his elementary school and worked with some of the kids during PE. And he talked about it today, with a little disappointment in his voice because of the choices you’ve made recently.
Then I remembered something. The day I became a Johnny fan. And football had nothing to do with it. I remembered a high school boy at dinner with his family (at Acapulco’s in Kerrville) and my then elementary age son DYING to go say hi. We wouldn’t let him because we wanted your family to eat in peace. But just days before that you had been at his school. He met you. And was convinced that made you life long friends. As we were leaving, my son made eye contact with you and you said hi. I don’t know if you remembered him or not, but my son was convinced you did. The two of you exchanged a quick conversation and we went on our way. But you left an impression on me. A good one. I saw a kid who, even though you were getting a lot of local press and your star was rising, still took time to talk to my son. You didn’t have to. And that day I became a fan.
I’m still a fan. Because I think you’re still that kid from Tivy High School who can flash that winning smile and make a 4th grader’s day. You’ve beat Alabama, resurrected a storied football program, won a Heisman and a bowl game. But I think at your core, you’re still a good person. Who carries, and has cracked under the weight of, a lot of responsibility and pressure.
But my son is teaching me to see the chance for redemption in everyone. And that’s what he sees in you right now. So, as a mom, I’m choosing to see it, too. I don’t know your parents, but I’m guessing your mom has had some frank talks with you. So as a mom, I’m going to have a frank talk “at” you.
Refocus on your faith. Somewhere in all of this, the faith you’ve talked about has left the forefront. Your faith will ground you, strengthen you, and give you the confidence to walk away from the trash talk that will be there. It will be there. IGNORE it!
Stay away from social media. I think someone else has already gotten that point across though, because you haven’t broadcasted your life in a while. And that’s a good thing. Yes, you have fans that want to “see” your life. But honestly, it’s no one’s business. Allow yourself a private life. You don’t owe anyone pictures. And as you’ve seen, those who don’t want you to succeed will use this all against you.
Remember that little eyes are watching you. Kids look up to you. And as a parent, it’s never fun to have to knock a knight off of his horse. I want my son to look up to you as a person who made mistakes, but found redemption. As a person who acknowledged mistakes and righted the ship. As a person who earned respect, not because of athletic ability but because of character in the face of trial. Stop being a lesson in what not to do. And start living your God-given potential. Notice nothing that I’ve said here has anything to do with football? Because IT DOESN’T MATTER! If you don’t live a life of character and fulfill your God-given potential, NONE OF IT matters.
It’s not too late to right the ship. It’s not too late to sit down with your family, your coaches, your teammates be accountable and be the leader you were created to be. There’s a reason you weren’t voted a Team Captain this year. And it has nothing to do with your age. You have a God-given gift. You could be one of the best quarterbacks to ever play the game. You have a platform to make a difference, to influence lives, to do good. And I may be in the minority and maybe a little naive, but I believe you want to do it right. But you have to start doing it differently and surround yourself with people who will keep you grounded.
You have a gift. And for now, you still have this family as fans. And we’re looking hard for reasons to stay fans. And we pray for you. Not because we know you, but because we’ll never understand the pressure you feel or the weight of the responsibility you carry. And because we’ve all made our own mistakes. And have found redemption. The same that’s there for you.
Sincerely,
Beth Bates
Wife, mom, fan
TFND (because Gig ‘em just isn’t in my vocabulary. Have I mentioned I bleed burnt orange?)

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Holy War in the Bible: Christian Morality and an Old Testament Problem

from here


Heath Thomas, Jeremy Evans, and Paul Copan, Holy War in the Bible: Christian Morality and an Old Testament Problem (Downers Grove: IVP Academic), 2013

Thomas, Evans, and Copan have assembled a stellar cast to discuss a fascinating topic which has serious relevance for Christians struggling with the entire topic of God’s supposed orders to exterminate entire peoples.

Indeed, this supposed order is used by atheists and agnostics and others as a cudgel against Christians as though 1) Christians were responsible for the deaths of ancient Canaanites (whilst, curiously, Jews are usually left out of the aspersions); and 2) Christians are asked such things as ‘how can you worship a God who orders people to kill others?’

The volume at hand does a very, very good job of assessing the issues and setting forth sensible and responsible answers to the most important and basic of questions.

The essays, as is always the case in any collection of essays, are varied in both usefulness, cogency, and power of presentation. To put it another way, all are good; some are very good; and some are fantastic.

Space and time prohibit individual examinations of each of the essays. Instead, what I’ll do is rate the essays on a 1-3 star basis. * = good. ** = very good. And *** = fantastically well done.
** 1. Orientation Amidst Diversity: An Introduction to the Volume, Geth Allison & Reid Powell
* 2. Joshua and the Crusades, Douglas S. Earl
* 3. Martial Memory, Peaceable Vision: Divine War in the Old Testament, Stephen Chapman
* 4. A Neglected Witness to ‘Holy War’ in the Writings, Heath Thomas
** 5. Vengeance, Wrath, and Warfare as Images of Divine Justice in John’s Apocalypse, Alan Bandy
* 6. The Rhetoric of Divine Warfare in Ephesians, Timothy Gombis
*** 7. Compassion and Wrath as Motivations for Divine Warfare, David Lamb
** 8. Holy War and herem: A Biblical Theology of herem, Douglas S. Earl
* 9. Crusade in the Old Testament and Today, Daniel Heimbac
* 10. The Ethics of ‘Holy War’ for Christian Morality and Theology, Paul Copan & Matthew Flannagan
* 11. The Prophets’ Call for Peacemaking Practices, Glen Stassen
* 12. ‘Holy War’, Divine Action, and New Atheism: Philosophical Considerations, Robert Stewart
** 13. The Unholy Notion of ‘Holy War’: A Christian Critique, Murray Rae
* 14. ‘Holy War’ and the New Atheism: A Dogmatic Response, Stephen Williams
* 15. Old Testament Holy War & Christian Morality: Where do We Go from Here? Jeremy Evans & Heath Thomas

By and large each essay has strengths and weaknesses, except David Lamb’s which, in my estimation, is all strength and no weakness. In his essay Lamb does something quite clever and turns the discussion in a direction which it seldom takes: compassion and wrath and their interconnection and interconnectedness. Divine anger and compassion are the themes herein and after assessing a little bit of the literature on holy war Lamb discusses compassion and wrath in Exodus and focuses specifically on

The songs that celebrate deliverance at the sea (Ex 15:1-21)
Covenant Code: Laws that protect the marginalized (Ex 22:20-26)
The Revelation of Yahweh’s Name (Ex 34:5-12)

Next of course he tackles Joshua and Judges, noting

In the book of Judges, YHWH fought against Israel in anger against their evil
deeds and for Israel in compassionate response to their cries for help (p. 144).

Throughout Lamb makes the point that covenant mercy is what moves YHWH to act in
punishment and deliverance and when he wars, he wars for a gracious purpose.

He next examines Isaiah, Psalm 78, Psalm 106, Mark, and Acts 7. His concluding section titled Warlike Behavior Worthy of Praise ties up all the loose ends and gives readers a great deal to think about (as does the essay as a whole).

...warfare motivated by compassion and anger is less problematic than warfare
motivated by other motives (p. 151).

Though a truism, Lamb’s point stands. The God of the Bible isn’t the capricious monster that atheists (who, curiously, don’t believe in God and yet are never unwilling to comment about the behavior of a God they profess they don’t believe in - which is rather akin to complaining about the behavior of leprechauns when one doesn’t believe they exist) would portray him to be and upon which skewed portrait go on to base their hatred of the concept of God.

I heartily commend the essays of this volume to readers interested in the thorny issue of the God of the Old Testament as he expresses wrath at unrighteousness and wars against the human proclivity to destroy itself.

Jim West
The Philippines Baptist Theological Seminary